1 CE-899
Southern India: Pandyas, Cholas, and Kalabhrasca50-ca1290 MonsDuring the 4th century CE, there were proto-states with varying degrees of organization and stability in central Thailand and southern Burma. The Mons, linguistically related to the Cambodians, were dominant. There are Mon inscriptions in Thailand and Myanmar from the 6th century. Founded by Mon people, Dvaravati (7th-11th centuries), with its main centers in Nakhon Pathom, U-Thong, and Lavo (modern Lop Buri), all west of the Chao Phraya river (although Dvaravati sites are scattered throughout central Thailand), was a ramshackle Theravada Buddhist kingdom. In fact, there is little evidence that Dvaravati was anything more than the general name for different sites occupied by the Mons. The occasional inscriptional mention of a king of Dvaravati probably refers to local rulers. Dvaravati sites, often characterized by ovoidal moats or defenses (observable in aerial photography), have yielded carvings and statues but little in the way of architecture. A frequent motif is the Dharmacakra or wheel of the law. Seated Buddhas, not the most common posture for the master, are found in Dvaravati. Buddha is sometimes depicted imparting learning to Hindu gods, but there are also Dvaravati in-the-round statues of mitred Shiva. In the Hindu epic Mahabharata, Dvaravati (sometimes translated as "gateway to the port or haven") was the name of Krishna's earthly kingdom. Other important Mon centers were Ligor in Thailand (modern Nakhon Si Thammarat) and Thaton in lower Burma. Ligor was also known as Tambralinga. There was an early Burmese kingdom called Linyang, capital Srikshetra, near today's Prome, whose likely dates are 670 to 830. It was peopled by Pyu, who were culturally influenced by the Mons. The Mons had control of the Irrawaddy delta and Thailand. In the 9th century they founded Pegu, near modern Yangon (Rangoon). By 937, the Cambodian Angkor empire had subjected the Mons in eastern Thailand. The Burmese king of Bagan, Anawratha (Anuruddha), captured Thaton in 1057. Mon Buddhism, a mixture of Theravada and Mahayana (Magadha), was important in the early history of Bagan, but the view that Theravada Buddhism was transmitted whole to Bagan from Thaton is now not generally accepted. The Khmer monarch Suryavarman I (1002-1050), supposedly a son of a king of Tambralinga, but of Cambodian royal lineage, landed in eastern Cambodia (today southern Vietnam) ca1001 and after a long civil war was installed in Angkor ca1010. Suryavarman conquered Lavo and subjected Mon lands as far as Ligor. Buddhist monks and Brahmins lived side by side in Lavo, but the style of the remains there is mainly Hindu-Khmer. The first mention of Mirma or Myanmar appears in a Mon inscription of 1102. Towards the end of the 12th century, Mon inscriptions disappear from Bagan completely substituted by Burmese. The Thais seized Lop Buri from the Mon-Khmer in the 13th century. Bagan was in political decadence by the time the Mongols invaded Burma (late 13th century). The Thais had by then replaced Khmer rule in central Thailand. Wareru was a pedlar in Thaton, later a captain of the guards in the Thai Sukhotai kingdom. Allied with another Mon leader, Tarabya, he expelled the Burmese from Pegu. After having Tarabya killed he ruled alone in independent Pegu (1281), but he established the capital of the Mon kingdom in Martaban (southern Myanmar), nominally vassasl of the Thai monarchy. He decreed a version of the Laws of Manu, an ancient Brahmin code. Under pressure from the Thais, the Mons moved their capital again to Pegu in 1363. During the 16th and 17th centuries they were beset by the Burmese. The Mons’ last political fling in Myanmar occurred in 1743 when they occupied Prome. The Mon warlord Talaban, armed by Europeans in Syriam (near Yangon), advanced to Ava, where they deposed the last Toungoo ruler, but they did not have the power to dominate the Burmese, who in 1758, under king Alaungapya, founder of the Konbaung dynasty, destroyed Mon power definitely. There are areas in Myanmar where the Mon language is still spoken, but it is nearly extinct in Thailand.
357-1203 Cambodia to the height of the Khmer empire386-ca1000 ca400-ca550Georgia: origins to fragmentationca400-1185 Japan: Nara and Heian to Kamakuraca410-ca1490 Visigothic Kingdomca410-1002 Burgundy to French suzeraintyca410-1066 Scotland to the conquest of Strathclydeca410-1282 Wales to English conquest423-476 Franks to the Carolingians 476-565 Rome: Odoacer, Ostogrogoths, and Justinian Serbs penetrate the Balkansca550-697 Sri Vijaya552-ca850 Avars558-774Lombards562-ca850 Kanauj618-979 Khazarsca650-ca1510 Thailand to the destruction of Angkorca650-ca1750 Myanmar to its final unification681-1018 First kingdom of Bulgaria697-1381 Nanchao711-1230 Asturias to its annexation by Castile711-750
Abbasidsca750-1202 Córdoba764-880 Carolingian Empire Basques to the foundation of Navarreca800-909 Tunisia: Aghlabids824-1035 Lorraine to union with Alsaceca850-1055 Persia: Buyidsca850-ca1050 Moraviaca850-1066 Norsemenca850-1610 The Tahirids were a Persian dynasty that ruled Khurasan in the 9th century as vassal of the Abbasids and begat the historical tendency to separate eastern from western Iran. They were overthrown by the Saffarids (ca860), who originated in Seistan (southeastern Persia), a land settled by Saka or Asian Scythians. The Saffarids attempted to take Baghdad. They were driven from Khurasan by the Persian Samanids (ca900) and retreated to their homeland. In the first half of the 10th century, a Turkic clan separated from the kingdom of the Samanids in Transoxiana and established itself in Ghazni (south west of Kabul in Afghanistan). The Ghaznavids overran the rest of Afghanistan and seized Khurasan ca950. The Seljuk invasions began in the 11th century. Around 1040, the Seljuks defeated Mahmud of Ghazni in Merv and took Khurasan. In 1117 the Seljuk Sanjar of Khurasan seized Afghanistan and became suzerain of Transoxiana. Khwarizm, a Turkic though not a Seljuk state, incorporated Khurasan (1180) and destroyed Seljuk Persia (1194). It conquered north Afghanistan from the Afghan Ghurids (ca1200). The Mongols destroyed and overran Khurasan and all of Persia (13th century). Herat became the seat of the Kerts, a Persian Sunni dynasty that ruled there from 1251. Initially Mongol vassals, the Kerts strengthened under Ghiyath ad-Din (d1329). They were at war with the Shia Sarbedarians, who set up a kingdom in northwestern Khurasan (1337) with lands they wrested from the Kerts. Herat was bloodily conquered by Timur or Tamerlane (1381), who also subjected the Sarbedarians. Khurasan was ruled by Shah Rukh, the most capable of Timur's sons, who tried but failed to keep the Persian and Samarkandian cores of his father's empire together. Shah Rukh died in 1447. The Timurid heirs were usually quarreling and warring among each other. In 1457, Abu Said, grandson of Timur, became master of Transoxiana and from there occupied Khurasan, which he defended against a takeover attempt by the Akkoyunlu from western Persia. Abu Said then tried to conquer the Akkoyunlu but was defeated and killed (1469). Russia to Mongol conquest862-ca1250 Flanders: French suzerainty and industrial development868-1174 Persia: Samanidsca890-ca1450 The Sahel is the band of territory in Africa in which the Sahara shades into savannah grassland. Under Islamic influence from northern Africa, kingdoms were formed in the Sahara and the Sahel. The most important were Ghana, Mali, Songhai, Wadai, and Bornu. In the conventional sense of lists of kings or even approximate geographical delimitations, states did not arise in Sub-Saharan Africa. On a primary demographic level, Sub-Saharan Africa was lightly populated when Europeans started visiting its coasts. There were no cities anywhere. The enclosure at Great Zimbabwe and its surrounding area cannot have contained more than 20,000 inhabitants, and this is the exception that proves the rule. Even after the arrival of Europeans, the filip to state-formation did not involve the growth of urban centers. Sub-Saharan Africa used to be called the dark continent. It is probably more accurate to call it the isolated continent, almost as isolated as was the western hemisphere from events in the rest of the world until the arrival of Europeans. The isolation of sub-Saharan Africa was not only from the cultures that lay to the north of the Sahara but also of its peoples from each other. Sub-Saharan Africa was a land of villages and these villages were in contact with contiguous villages but not much beyond these. The proto-kingdoms that existed might have involved a royal compound from which at most rule was exerted over congeries of villages and some additional territories such as, for instance, the gold mines of Asante. Additionally, these villages did not thrive everywhere. Much of Africa was thick tropical jungle, uninhabitable desert, or dry, scrubby flatland good only for hunting, collecting, or scavenging. Savannah land, lying between jungle and desert and subject to fickle weather patterns, was considered prime real estate. The Arabs, who for centuries had been sailing down the eastern coast of Africa, did not make any significant urban foundations before the 16th century. Sub-Saharan Africa was pristine, awesome, even sublimely beautiful, but it was not propitious for the development of higher cultures. And behind the immediate façade there lurked and had lurked since the beginning of human settlement, the scourge of endemic diseases that wasted away those it spared. The habitat of the Tsetse fly in Africa delimits the areas where cattle-raising is possible. This insect affects humans and cattle by injecting a micro-organism called trypanosome, which produces sleeping sickness, a disease that still affects the inhabitants of ten million square kilometers of tropical Africa. Bilharzia and hookworm infiltrate human organs and produce lifelong physical debility. The greatest of all killers was a lethal form of malaria--other varieties were recurrent and prostrating--for which Africans developed a defense in the form of blood corpuscles called sickle cells. The problem with this adaptation is that when sickle-cell genes are inherited from both parents it produces an anemic sickness which is usually fatal. Caught in the reciprocally reinforcing traps of difficult environments, enervating climates, and killing or wasting diseases, the population of Sub-Saharan Africa did not grow very much. Overall population estimates for the Americas in the 15th century are even lower than those for Africa, but they were as high as those in Europe in the heartlands of the Aztec and the Inca empires. Isolated from cultural diffusion from the north by immense desert wastes, African populations by themselves never attained the concentration needed for the cultural density that would have produced more evolved political formations. As would be expected, the arrival of Europeans for the sole purpose of economic exploitation not only did not raise the cultural level at which Sub-Saharan Africa was but it exacerbated the social conditions that made slavery a virtual universal institution. This political backwardness does not necessarily mean that there were no cultural achievements of note. The antecessors of the famous Ife castings were already being created in the 9th century by the Igbo people (southeastern Nigeria). In some parts of Africa there were societies that made an optimum utilization of their ecologies without the disadvantages of the conflicts involved in state-building. There is also evidence of incipient, potentially grandiose state-formation. The archaeological remains of Great Zimbabwe comprise drystone walls on a monumental scale. This kingdom possibly began in the 12th century, built its impressive enclosure in the 14th century, but by ca1500 its capital had been abandoned. There were some minor successor states which did not grow beyond a basically tribal stage. One of the most important ethnic groups of sub-Saharan Africa are the Yoruba of southwestern Nigeria (with some settlement areas in modern Benin and Togo). The Yoruba never created an unified state, but there was a very strong Yoruba cultural identity that spread with the slave trade to America. The closest the Yoruba came to relative political unification was with the Oyo kingdom. Benin, to the east of Oyo in southern Nigeria, was also a Yoruba state. Dahomey, also probably Yoruba, lay to the west of Oyo. Both Oyo and Benin, known mainly from traditional sources, traced their origins to the city of Ife, in southwestern Nigeria, possibly within Oyo. In the 13th and 14th centuries Ife was the source of magnificently sculpted heads moulded by the cire perdue technique. Yoruba settlements grew to become important cities and political centers, principally Ibadan, Ilesha, and Ilorin. In the 15th century, the Mossi people created proto-states in Ouagadougou (today the capital of Burkina Fasso) and in Yatenga. In the territory of modern Ghana, there existed the Akwamu kingdom, founded by the Akan people. North of the Akan during the 17th century, the Mande people formed proto-states known as Gonja and Dagomba. Saharan and Sahelian Africa today comprise Burkina Fasso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and northern Nigeria. Formation of Holy Roman Empire |